Just got around to reading our Daily Journal for October 30. It had this description of the Brinkley v. Public Storage, Inc. (DAR 16341) case:
"Labor Law: Employee must suffer injury from employer's knowing and intentional misstatement to recover for violation of Labor Code section 226."
We thought the case had much more to say than that, and we didn't think the 226 issue was the most interesting issue in the holding.
Comments